Have you seen the NASA Future of War document? It should terrify you.

Micro Dust Weaponry – NASA 2001 would “co-opt” insects

Some of the X post below is reproduced here. The documents referred to are linked below. Read through to see the list of “Legal” weapons of war. Also read the X post in full.

According to this documentation, posted by @Inversionism on X, this was a presentation from the Chief Scientist Dennis M Bushnell at the NASA Langley Research Center in 2001, where he predicts and discusses future strategic issues and future warfare for the future: around 2025.

Inversionism says:

Given we are just a couple years from this supposed date, what better time to share one of the most wild, terrifying, and ominous documents I’ve ever seen. What’s more concerning is that a SPACE AGENCY, NASA, is producing such content like this. If you know the history of NASA, you’d know operation paperclip.

Isn’t it weird how often everything ties back to the JFK assassination and Operation Paperclip? Almost as if it was a coup and the US merged with mad scientist lunatics for world domination.

For those of you who think it’s fake, it was published directly on the DTIC military website, along with a schedule where it’s referenced. The presentation from Bushnell was not video or audio recorded, but we have the slides. I’m sure if there was video or audio evidence, it would be one of the most horrifying lectures of all time.

The 4th Annual Testing and Training for Readiness Symposium & Exhibition: Emerging Challenges, Opportunities and Requirement

https://web.archive.org/web/20020409151859/http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2001testing/index.html…

Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025]

https://web.archive.org/web/20031224161719/http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2001testing/bushnell.pdf…

The primary reason why I find this document so unsettling, is not only because it was given in 2001, but Bushnell from the jump tells you that it “is based in all cases upon existing, data/trends/analyses/technologies (e.g. NO PIXIE DUST)”, meaning this is real technology the military already has, and it lists all the agencies that he had involved. See image 1. He’s explicitly telling you that this stuff is REAL and the government/military and corporations are actively pushing for such a horrifying future.

In image 2, he talks about the need to “plan differently” now, because the world is in the process of a IT/Bio/Nano technological revolution, and we’re advancing in scales of months instead of decades.

He then refers to “spaceship earth”, where he lists the crew (humanity, the people, etc) as plundering the ship’s supplies, tinkering with the temperature and life support controls, and INCREASING the size of the crew by 2 million per week. There is the population overgrowth narrative again…

As you get further into the document, it gets more and more horrifying. There is discussion of AI nanobot smart dust that is inhaled into the lungs, bores into lung tissue, and “executes various pathological missions”. He calls it a wholly new class of weaponry which is legal. HOW IS THAT LEGAL?!?

He also discusses microwave weapons for behavioral control and altering brain function, the use of bioengineering fungi/prions/parasites and other substances as “fingerprintless” bio archipelago, like these are going to be the repertoire of death and war.

Here are some written excerpts. I’ll upload some additional images in the comments below.

What is Apparently “Legal”

• Microwave/RF Anti-Functional and AntiPersonnel Weaponry

• Chemical Anti-Functional Weaponry • Chemical “Psychological Effects” via Sensory Organs Weaponry (e.g. smell)

• Chemical Personnel Incapacitation Weaponry [“Non-Warfare” (e.g. Hostage/Terrorism) only]

• PSYWAR

• Acoustic Weaponry

• Mechanical Micro Dust

Please click through to the X post and read it in full. It is fascinating how they extrapolated the turn of the century science into these predictions. And remember “”NO PIXIE DUST”, this was all down technology upon which they based their predictions.

Guest Contributor

Self-Reliance Central publishes a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of SRC. Reproduced with permission.